229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-23.28%
Negative revenue growth while Technology median is 3.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-23.01%
Negative gross profit growth while Technology median is 6.41%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-30.92%
Negative EBIT growth while Technology median is 8.43%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-30.92%
Negative operating income growth while Technology median is 10.21%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-31.79%
Negative net income growth while Technology median is 6.26%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-31.54%
Negative EPS growth while Technology median is 6.66%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-31.25%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Technology median is 7.33%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.58%
Share reduction while Technology median is 0.13%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.63%
Diluted share reduction while Technology median is 0.04%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-1.97%
Dividend cuts while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-19.99%
Negative OCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-22.65%
Negative FCF growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
154.08%
10Y revenue/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 41.54%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique moat or brand fosters outperformance over a decade.
90.21%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 32.06%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
6.43%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Technology median of 17.14%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
94.02%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 2.30% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
109.30%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 17.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-7.68%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Technology median is 0.43%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
182.26%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Technology median of 69.09% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
156.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 57.95%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
7.57%
Below 50% of Technology median. Jim Chanos might see a red flag indicating fundamental short-term issues in profitability or cost control.
-19.97%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-0.93%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Technology median is 17.62%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
7.60%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Technology median of 2.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
111.76%
Dividend/share CAGR of 111.76% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
29.51%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 29.51% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
13.49%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 13.49% while Technology is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-16.03%
AR shrinking while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-9.29%
Decreasing inventory while Technology is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.74%
Assets shrink while Technology median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
0.64%
1.25-1.5x Technology median. Mohnish Pabrai sees disciplined reinvestment or strong earnings retention behind outperformance.
1.43%
Slightly rising debt while Technology median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
3.41%
R&D growth of 3.41% while Technology median is zero. Walter Schloss wonders if a slight increase yields a meaningful competitive edge.
-6.23%
SG&A decline while Technology grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.
