229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.39%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.34%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.56%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.19%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.70%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x GPRO's 3.20%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.10%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.78%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.42%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.69%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.35%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.71%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.36%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.48%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.43%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.10%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.61%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
