229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.32%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
1.91%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 7.48%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-5.69%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-4.43%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.82%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.57%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.63%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-24.37%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.47%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.78%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.84%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.55%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-31.25%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.33%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.24%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-31.26%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.34%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.09%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-31.09%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.51%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.51%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
