229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.67%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
3.63%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 7.48%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-19.27%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-14.41%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.77%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.16%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.27%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-226.57%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-240.68%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-281.37%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-292.27%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-70.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-269.76%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-279.96%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-269.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-269.79%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-280.00%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-276.83%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-270.73%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.04%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
