229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
14.97%
Similar revenue growth to GPRO's 13.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
27.44%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-8.42%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-20.35%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.60%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-1.61%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.66%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.57%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
117.03%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 71.03%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
103.26%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 69.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
102.84%
Operating margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 72.74%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-192.12%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
101.45%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.26%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 70.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
101.47%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
101.43%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 64.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.25%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 69.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
101.38%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
101.43%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-1.94%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
