229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
75.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 13.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
82.35%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
58.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 26.68%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.87%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.76%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.02%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.03%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.67%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
12.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
113.16%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 69.02%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
21.54%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
128.95%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
119.20%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
24.99%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 70.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
550.00%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.86%
Similar net income growth to GPRO's 64.84%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-5.99%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
60.32%
Similar EPS growth to GPRO's 66.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
64.29%
Similar diluted EPS growth to GPRO's 66.67%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
2.63%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
