229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.99%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.59%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-9.56%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.95%
Similar margin change to GPRO's 11.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
2.22%
R&D growth 50-75% of GPRO's 3.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.25%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while GPRO shows 80.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.00%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.57%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.32%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.19%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.30%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.10%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
16.42%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.25%
Pre-tax margin growth 50-75% of GPRO's 70.49%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.32%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 64.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
53.38%
Similar net margin growth to GPRO's 69.06%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
26.73%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.91%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
