229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.17%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.17%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.09%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.41%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.43%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.65%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.05%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.14%
Similar EBITDA growth to GPRO's 67.07%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
67.48%
Similar EBITDA margin growth to GPRO's 71.03%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
68.57%
Similar operating income growth to GPRO's 69.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
79.66%
Similar operating margin growth to GPRO's 72.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-59.04%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-15.36%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.16%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.06%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.16%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.21%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.60%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
