229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.44%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive cost position.
-14.00%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.07%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.12%
R&D growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize investment rationale.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.13%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.00%
Interest expense growth less than half of GPRO's 80.18%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-28.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
76.92%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
10.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.10%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.16%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.19%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.00%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.05%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.45%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.15%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.90% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
