229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.41%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.42%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-4.40%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.01%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.50%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-400.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.79%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-3.48%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-33.33%
Interest expense reduction while GPRO shows 80.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-3.45%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-20.69%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.03%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.31%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.05%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.70%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.09%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.82%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-53.33%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-20.00%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.31%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.00%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.82%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.25%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
