229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.01%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
0.38%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 7.48%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
6.56%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.46%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.42%
Similar R&D growth to GPRO's 3.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-125.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.79%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.85%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.03%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
200.00%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
9.17%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
54.55%
Similar operating income growth to GPRO's 69.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
51.50%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of GPRO's 72.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
172.50%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.67%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 66.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.93%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 70.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.67%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
86.67%
Net income growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 64.84%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.93%
Net margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 69.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.36%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
86.36%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
0.10%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.10%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
