229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.20%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.84%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
2.96%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.75%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.65%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-0.67%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.25%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
100.00%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
-8.35%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.76%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-11.94%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.69%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
337.50%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
337.02%
Pre-tax margin growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 70.49%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
350.00%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
333.33%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 64.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
332.86%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 69.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
333.33%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
333.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.40%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.89%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
