229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
4.75%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.68%
Similar cost growth to GPRO's 7.48%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
2.39%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.25%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.84%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 3.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
50.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.07%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.33%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.00%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 67.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
53.33%
Similar operating income growth to GPRO's 69.02%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
46.39%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of GPRO's 72.74%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-26.09%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
36.84%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of GPRO's 66.46%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
30.64%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 70.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.00%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
35.71%
Net income growth 50-75% of GPRO's 64.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
29.57%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.57%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
28.57%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.08%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.42%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
