229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
11.00%
Similar revenue growth to GPRO's 13.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
12.71%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.54%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.02%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.50%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.43%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.64%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.48%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
48.08%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of GPRO's 67.07%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
5.10%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
86.96%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 69.02%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
68.42%
Similar operating margin growth to GPRO's 72.74%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
41.18%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
111.54%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.46%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
90.57%
Pre-tax margin growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 70.49%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
100.00%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
131.58%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 64.84%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
108.62%
Net margin growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 69.06%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
144.44%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
133.33%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 66.67%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
0.39%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.78%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
