229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-4.84%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-6.19%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.12%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
3.90%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.36%
Similar R&D growth to GPRO's 3.20%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.33%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.30%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-4.40%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-50.00%
Interest expense reduction while GPRO shows 80.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
9.09%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.67%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.15%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.35%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
6.50%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-184.62%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.44%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.70%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-26.98%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.27%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.03%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.67%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.80%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
1.59%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
