229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.50%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
5.51%
Cost growth 50-75% of GPRO's 7.48%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
5.47%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.03%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.63%
R&D growth 50-75% of GPRO's 3.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.35%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.71%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
600.00%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x GPRO's 80.18%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
13.89%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.47%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 67.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
13.57%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-4.00%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.00%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
218.18%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.81%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.89%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 70.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
33.33%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.61%
Net income growth 50-75% of GPRO's 64.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
25.70%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
31.82%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.27%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
2.65%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.80%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
