229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-24.18%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.83%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-17.07%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
9.37%
Similar margin change to GPRO's 11.47%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
-3.30%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 3.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.65%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-23.38%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-29.47%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.78%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.73%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
21.69%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.17%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-27.20%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.98%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.69%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.43%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.29%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.40%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-27.71%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.22%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.50%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
