229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
10.69%
Similar revenue growth to GPRO's 13.65%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
12.48%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
6.57%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-3.72%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.29%
R&D growth 50-75% of GPRO's 3.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine spending effectiveness.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-75.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.93%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
11.17%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.79%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
83.57%
EBITDA growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 67.07%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
50.67%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of GPRO's 71.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-15.90%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.02%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
18.95%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.08%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.45%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.29%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
14.83%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 64.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.74%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.65%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
14.58%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.30%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.32%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
