229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.71%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.75%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.88%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
4.77%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.27%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 3.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-60.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-7.25%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-19.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.86%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.48%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.28%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-21.59%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.34%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-60.13%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-24.26%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.66%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.68%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-24.92%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.49%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.12%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.23%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.17%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
