229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.13%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 13.65%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
2.35%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 7.48%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
1.75%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.37%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.90%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.60%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.60%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.33%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-9.08%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.98%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.30%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.79%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
0.12%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.19%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
1.99%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 64.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.14%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.66%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1.26%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.28%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.68%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
