229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.93%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.08%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-12.26%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.94%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 11.47%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
7.04%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
51.52%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.37%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-13.12%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.35%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-19.36%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.31%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.79%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.16%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
51.52%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-15.32%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.80%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-9.00%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.72%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.69%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.69%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.44%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.34%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
