229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
16.30%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 13.65%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine if growth advantage is sustainable.
21.46%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.08%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 26.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-6.21%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.92%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.55%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
20.44%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.39%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
13.27%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 67.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.61%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
6.41%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.51%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
16.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.53%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-8.41%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.80%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
5.82%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 64.84%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.01%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 69.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.33%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.33%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.51%
Share count reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.49%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of GPRO's 0.90%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
