229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.57%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 13.65%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
34.16%
Cost growth above 1.5x GPRO's 7.48%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
22.43%
Similar gross profit growth to GPRO's 26.68%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry dynamics.
-5.52%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 11.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.47%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-612.07%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
8.57%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.91%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.51%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.16%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 67.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.09%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 71.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
28.65%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.71%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 72.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
23817.24%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
27.24%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.46%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.49% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
10.97%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
32.43%
Net income growth 50-75% of GPRO's 64.84%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.21%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.77%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.77%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 66.67%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.26%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.16%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
