229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-7.76%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.13%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-0.78%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.57%
Margin expansion 50-75% of GPRO's 11.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
1.04%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 3.20%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.14%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-11.21%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.91%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 67.07%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
10.06%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.60%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.02%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.06%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-80.88%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-0.79%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
7.55%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 70.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-2.35%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.28%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
8.10%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.42%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.30%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
