229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.43%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 13.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.54%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 7.48% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.33%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.02%
Margin expansion 50-75% of GPRO's 11.47%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize competitive position.
10.95%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 3.20%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.48%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-5.44%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.90%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.64%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.82%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 67.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 71.03%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.28%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 69.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.90%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 72.74%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.03%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-11.13%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 66.46% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.08%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 70.49%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-11.40%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-11.04%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 64.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.19%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 69.06%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-12.00%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.00%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 66.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.27%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
0.35%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.90%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
