229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 185.21%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
7.67%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 221.25%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-3.95%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 137.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-6.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.42%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 12.45%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9225.00%
Other expenses change of 9225.00% while GPRO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
11.72%
Operating expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 50.31%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-24.34%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 139.42% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.49%
D&A growth less than half of GPRO's 101.05%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-6.07%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 442.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.41%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 220.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.44%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 383.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.91%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 199.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.71%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-8.16%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 377.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.57%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 197.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.08%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 86.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-6.81%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.82%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.06%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.19%
Share count increase while GPRO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.12%
Diluted share increase while GPRO reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
