229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-20.01%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-18.53%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-22.37%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.95%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
10.79%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 38.92%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
278.05%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.44%
Operating expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 14.86%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-16.49%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.55%
D&A growth less than half of GPRO's 45.18%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-24.21%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.23%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.03%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.77%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.89%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.97%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.70%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.90%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-27.00%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.74%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.00%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.53%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
0.08%
Share count change of 0.08% while GPRO is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
-0.12%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
