229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-18.99%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 8.51% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-18.18%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 6.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.34%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 12.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.66%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 3.79% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.27%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 17.38%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.25%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.48%
Operating expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 3.00%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-15.74%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 5.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.12%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-23.40%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 188.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.62%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 181.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.73%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 88.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.56%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 89.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.56%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-26.89%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 68.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.75%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 70.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.51%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 48.21% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.73%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 78.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.78%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 80.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 78.41% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-25.00%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 78.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.24%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.30%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.00% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
