229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-22.24%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 15.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.42%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 13.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-20.46%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 18.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
2.29%
Similar margin change to GPRO's 2.64%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry pricing power.
1.21%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 18.24%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-35.98%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 105.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-4.17%
Operating expenses reduction while GPRO shows 4.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-21.20%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 9.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
24.43%
Interest expense change of 24.43% while GPRO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
-3.73%
D&A reduction while GPRO shows 19.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-22.61%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 95.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.48%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 64.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.61%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 107.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.06%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 79.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
68.24%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of GPRO's 105.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
-23.97%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 131.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 99.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.86%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 243.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-24.72%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 109.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.19%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 80.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.38%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 100.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.68%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 118.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.84%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.66% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.80%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
