229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.49%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-12.90%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-16.80%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2.71%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 0.73% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.05%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 15.26%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.57%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
3.02%
Operating expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 7.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-10.66%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
23.31%
Interest expense change of 23.31% while GPRO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
24.41%
D&A growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 18.25%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize asset base.
-17.30%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-3.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.95%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-9.90%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
36.36%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-22.04%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.83%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-24.00%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-21.31%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.34%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-20.69%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.10%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 1.99% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.06%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
