229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
3.82%
Revenue growth below 50% of GPRO's 9.06%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
3.44%
Cost growth less than half of GPRO's 44.16%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
4.41%
Positive growth while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
0.56%
Margin expansion while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
9.14%
R&D growth while GPRO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.86%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 188.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
5.21%
Similar operating expenses growth to GPRO's 6.80%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
3.73%
Total costs growth less than half of GPRO's 28.22%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
18.41%
Interest expense change of 18.41% while GPRO maintains costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate control.
1.13%
D&A growth less than half of GPRO's 26.36%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
3.35%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.46%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.83%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.01%
Operating margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.56%
Other expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 188.71%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
4.07%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.24%
Pre-tax margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.74%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.19%
Net income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.35%
Net margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
4.26%
EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
6.52%
Diluted EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.45%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.57%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
