229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.76%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 39.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-30.65%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 26.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-30.93%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 85.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.25%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 32.86% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.85%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1255.26%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.83%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 0.40%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-26.30%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 15.61% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
7.90%
Interest expense growth above 1.5x GPRO's 1.18%. Michael Burry would check for over-leverage.
-0.22%
D&A reduction while GPRO shows 2.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-35.79%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 65.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.27%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 72.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.51%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 58.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-12.64%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 70.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-63.76%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-40.18%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 53.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.62%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 66.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-66.32%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 125.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-31.11%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 51.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.52%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 65.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.59%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 50.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.90%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 50.91% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.72%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.13% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.73%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.95% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
