229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.88%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 1.15% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-12.92%
Both companies reducing costs. Martin Whitman would check industry efficiency trends.
-12.81%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 9.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
0.07%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 7.95%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
9.56%
R&D growth 1.1-1.25x GPRO's 7.67%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-122.78%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 159.76% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-3.24%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-11.23%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
6.82%
Interest expense growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-2.70%
D&A reduction while GPRO shows 5.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-18.01%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 51.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.89%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 59.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-20.65%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 30.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.92%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 31.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
145.26%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 30.94%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-17.84%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 30.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-5.69%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 31.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-24.77%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 152.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-16.66%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 27.31% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.35%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 28.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.49%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 29.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.71%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 29.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.84%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 1.48% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-2.80%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.65% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
