229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.09%
Revenue growth 50-75% of GPRO's 31.98%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize if slower growth is temporary.
18.18%
Similar cost growth to GPRO's 20.71%. Walter Schloss would investigate if industry cost pressures are temporary.
17.94%
Gross profit growth below 50% of GPRO's 56.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.13%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 18.29% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.32%
R&D growth while GPRO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.00%
Other expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 692.44%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
5.15%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.71%
Total costs growth 1.1-1.25x GPRO's 12.67%. Bill Ackman would demand justification.
2.60%
Interest expense growth less than half of GPRO's 5.70%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
3.34%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.53%
EBITDA growth below 50% of GPRO's 513.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.61%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 467.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
27.80%
Operating income growth below 50% of GPRO's 254.38%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.22%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 216.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-54.91%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 109.08% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
23.61%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of GPRO's 231.68%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
4.68%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 199.77%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
30.08%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
22.62%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 216.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
3.84%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 188.59%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.42%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 215.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
25.86%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 215.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.65%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.58% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.60%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 2.26% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
