229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
34.04%
Positive growth while GPRO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
34.68%
Cost increase while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
33.00%
Positive growth while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-0.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.05%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 1.43%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-202.14%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.38%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
29.62%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.53%
Interest expense growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
23.28%
Similar D&A growth to GPRO's 29.99%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry patterns.
41.70%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.71%
EBITDA margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.84%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.06%
Operating margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.82%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
45.58%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.61%
Pre-tax margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
71.65%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
41.35%
Net income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.45%
Net margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.89%
EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
43.84%
Diluted EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.37%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.53%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
