229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-19.61%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.25%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 20.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-14.10%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 26.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
6.86%
Margin expansion exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 2.95%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.92%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 16.56%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-818.75%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 196.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-6.83%
Operating expenses reduction while GPRO shows 9.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.97%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 15.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.02%
Interest expense growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
4.91%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-16.30%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 3133.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
4.12%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 2019.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.98%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 370.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.02%
Operating margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 320.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
1028.89%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 22.38%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-16.58%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 159.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
3.77%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 148.17%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-9.18%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-17.82%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 266.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
2.22%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 236.05%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-17.06%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 257.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-16.67%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 249.70% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-1.07%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 5.77% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.08%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 8.33% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
