229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-21.52%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 15.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-21.50%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 22.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-21.54%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 6.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.03%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
1.28%
R&D growth less than half of GPRO's 14.62%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-174.38%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-4.08%
Operating expenses reduction while GPRO shows 10.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-18.77%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 17.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.43%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
1.48%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-25.96%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-5.66%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.74%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
164.78%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 19.86%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-26.92%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-22.42%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 315.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-27.78%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.98%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.01%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-27.62%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.69%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.70%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
