229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.72%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 21.72% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.97%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 22.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-15.68%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 20.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
6.42%
R&D growth while GPRO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
108.61%
Other expenses growth 50-75% of GPRO's 158.20%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine cost efficiency.
3.16%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 0.38%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-10.80%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 14.13% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
4.05%
Interest expense growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
2.48%
D&A growth less than half of GPRO's 35.03%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-20.89%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 305.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-7.24%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 238.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-23.03%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 424.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.74%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 331.19% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-106.25%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 55.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.47%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 795.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.26%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 635.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.34%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 5318.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-22.26%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 597.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.85%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 473.04% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-22.08%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.05%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 400.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.71%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 7.59% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.86%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
