229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.66%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 5.21%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
10.57%
Cost growth 50-75% of GPRO's 14.61%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
6.16%
Positive growth while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-2.31%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-0.53%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1353.85%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 696.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
2.96%
Operating expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 11.98%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
8.94%
Total costs growth 50-75% of GPRO's 13.76%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
15.02%
Interest expense growth 1.25-1.5x GPRO's 10.55%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize debt strategy.
2.14%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
9.54%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
0.80%
EBITDA margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.88%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.72%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-2270.00%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 205.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
6.90%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.62%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
8.61%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
6.58%
Net income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-1.92%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.50%
EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.50%
Diluted EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.82%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.88%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
