229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
29.96%
Positive growth while GPRO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
28.38%
Cost increase while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
32.12%
Positive growth while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.66%
Margin expansion while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
14.02%
R&D growth above 1.5x GPRO's 5.99%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
341.10%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 25.72%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
11.42%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
24.95%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
21.28%
Interest expense growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
1.78%
D&A growth while GPRO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
37.33%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
5.67%
EBITDA margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
44.68%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.32%
Operating margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-65.82%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 77.54% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
44.47%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.17%
Pre-tax margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
42.91%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
44.77%
Net income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.40%
Net margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
46.51%
EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
45.74%
Diluted EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.86%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-1.01%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
