229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
9.41%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 0.38%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
8.12%
Cost increase while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
11.02%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x GPRO's 7.31%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
1.47%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 6.91%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-1.81%
R&D reduction while GPRO shows 5.24% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-119.03%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 164.80% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-1.84%
Operating expenses reduction while GPRO shows 11.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
5.82%
Total costs growth above 1.5x GPRO's 1.93%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
0.40%
Interest expense growth less than half of GPRO's 5.55%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.07%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
13.71%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.93%
EBITDA margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
17.27%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
7.18%
Operating margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.94%
Other expenses growth less than half of GPRO's 400.25%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
18.76%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
8.54%
Pre-tax margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
41.73%
Tax expense growth while GPRO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
15.47%
Net income growth below 50% of GPRO's 34.36%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.53%
Net margin growth below 50% of GPRO's 34.61%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.75%
EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 33.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
15.87%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of GPRO's 33.88%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-0.63%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-0.65%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
