229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
33.61%
Positive growth while GPRO shows revenue decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
31.89%
Cost increase while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate competitive disadvantage.
35.69%
Positive growth while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
1.56%
Margin expansion below 50% of GPRO's 3.12%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
5.32%
R&D growth while GPRO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.36%
Operating expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
26.84%
Total costs growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.35%
D&A growth 50-75% of GPRO's 14.32%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine asset strategy.
45.91%
EBITDA growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
9.21%
EBITDA margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.70%
Operating income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
12.05%
Operating margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-272.41%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
49.36%
Pre-tax income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
11.79%
Pre-tax margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
58.51%
Tax expense growth less than half of GPRO's 10080.22%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
47.74%
Net income growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
10.58%
Net margin growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
48.98%
EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
49.32%
Diluted EPS growth while GPRO declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-0.57%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.61%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.01% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
