229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-24.10%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 19.78% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-25.09%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 28.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-22.94%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 3.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.53%
Margin expansion while GPRO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.69%
Similar R&D growth to GPRO's 3.39%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry innovation requirements.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.20%
Operating expenses reduction while GPRO shows 7.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-20.89%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 18.20% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.42%
D&A reduction while GPRO shows 17.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
-28.89%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-6.30%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 6.84% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.95%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 6.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
416.00%
Other expenses growth while GPRO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-30.42%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-8.32%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 5.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.98%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-30.31%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 85.90% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.18%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 88.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.14%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 86.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.82%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 86.16% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.67%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.93% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.93% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
