229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-5.48%
Revenue decline while GPRO shows 39.03% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-4.92%
Cost reduction while GPRO shows 29.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-6.13%
Gross profit decline while GPRO shows 61.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-0.69%
Margin decline while GPRO shows 16.18% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
1.30%
R&D growth while GPRO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.80%
Operating expenses growth above 1.5x GPRO's 0.10%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
-3.62%
Total costs reduction while GPRO shows 16.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.49%
D&A growth less than half of GPRO's 17.19%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-8.24%
EBITDA decline while GPRO shows 92.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.92%
EBITDA margin decline while GPRO shows 93.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.13%
Operating income decline while GPRO shows 81.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.86%
Operating margin decline while GPRO shows 86.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.13%
Other expenses reduction while GPRO shows 8866.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.14%
Pre-tax income decline while GPRO shows 86.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.87%
Pre-tax margin decline while GPRO shows 90.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Tax expense reduction while GPRO shows 56.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-9.26%
Net income decline while GPRO shows 82.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.99%
Net margin decline while GPRO shows 87.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
EPS decline while GPRO shows 82.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.50%
Diluted EPS decline while GPRO shows 82.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.56%
Share count reduction while GPRO shows 0.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.75%
Diluted share reduction while GPRO shows 0.81% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
