229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.39%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.34%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-2.56%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-1.19%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
3.70%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
0.10%
Total costs growth less than half of SONO's 8.32%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.35%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-3.78%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-2.42%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.69%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.35%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
38.71%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-4.36%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-3.02%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
1.48%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.43%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.10%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-4.85%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.61%
Share count reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
-0.72%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
