229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
13.16%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
20.71%
Cost growth 50-75% of SONO's 33.45%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainable cost advantages.
4.33%
Gross profit growth below 50% of SONO's 31.79%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-7.80%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.81%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
7.54%
Similar total costs growth to SONO's 8.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.33%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
46.23%
EBITDA growth below 50% of SONO's 93.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
38.92%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
82.98%
Similar operating income growth to SONO's 95.22%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
61.70%
Operating margin growth 50-75% of SONO's 96.40%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-24.99%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
65.21%
Pre-tax income growth 50-75% of SONO's 98.63%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.00%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
65.11%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
65.31%
Net income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
46.09%
Net margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.37%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
65.28%
EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
65.28%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
0.05%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x SONO's 0.42%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
-0.27%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
