229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
75.37%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 32.73%. David Dodd would verify if faster growth reflects superior business model.
82.35%
Cost growth above 1.5x SONO's 33.45%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
58.07%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x SONO's 31.79%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-9.87%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
9.76%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-140.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
29.02%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
69.03%
Total costs growth above 1.5x SONO's 8.32%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.26%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
100.67%
Similar EBITDA growth to SONO's 93.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
12.76%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
113.16%
Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 95.22%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
21.54%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
128.95%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
119.20%
Pre-tax income growth 1.25-1.5x SONO's 98.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
24.99%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
550.00%
Tax expense growth while SONO reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
64.86%
Net income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.18%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
-5.99%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
60.32%
EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
64.29%
Diluted EPS growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.83%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
2.63%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
0.99%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
