229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-16.99%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-19.59%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-9.56%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
8.95%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
2.22%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
Other expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-7.33%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-17.25%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-100.00%
Both companies reducing interest expense. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
5.00%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
-69.57%
EBITDA decline while SONO shows 93.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.32%
EBITDA margin decline while SONO shows 94.97% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-71.19%
Operating income decline while SONO shows 95.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-65.30%
Operating margin decline while SONO shows 96.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
43.10%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
16.42%
Pre-tax income growth below 50% of SONO's 98.63%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
40.25%
Pre-tax margin growth below 50% of SONO's 98.96%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-5.49%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
27.32%
Net income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.18%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
53.38%
Net margin growth 50-75% of SONO's 96.37%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
26.73%
EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
23.91%
Diluted EPS growth below 50% of SONO's 94.83%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
0.70%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
2.00%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
