229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-6.17%
Revenue decline while SONO shows 32.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-8.17%
Cost reduction while SONO shows 33.45% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-1.09%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
5.41%
Margin expansion while SONO shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
5.43%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.06%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-6.65%
Total costs reduction while SONO shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.05%
D&A growth while SONO reduces D&A. John Neff would investigate differences.
57.14%
EBITDA growth 50-75% of SONO's 93.33%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
67.48%
EBITDA margin growth 50-75% of SONO's 94.97%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
68.57%
Operating income growth 50-75% of SONO's 95.22%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize operations.
79.66%
Similar operating margin growth to SONO's 96.40%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
-59.04%
Other expenses reduction while SONO shows 2.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-15.36%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-9.80%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-18.60%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.16%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-8.52%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-14.06%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-13.16%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.21%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.60%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
