229.02 - 234.51
169.21 - 260.10
55.82M / 54.92M (Avg.)
32.24 | 7.26
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
2.47%
Revenue growth below 50% of SONO's 32.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
9.44%
Cost growth less than half of SONO's 33.45%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
-14.00%
Gross profit decline while SONO shows 31.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-16.07%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
4.12%
R&D growth while SONO reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-50.00%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
2.13%
Operating expenses growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
7.79%
Similar total costs growth to SONO's 8.32%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
20.00%
Interest expense growth while SONO reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-28.00%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
76.92%
Similar EBITDA growth to SONO's 93.33%. Walter Schloss would investigate industry trends.
10.56%
EBITDA margin growth below 50% of SONO's 94.97%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
22.03%
Operating income growth below 50% of SONO's 95.22%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
19.10%
Operating margin growth below 50% of SONO's 96.40%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
42.16%
Other expenses growth above 1.5x SONO's 2.87%. Michael Burry would check for concerning trends.
-15.19%
Pre-tax income decline while SONO shows 98.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.23%
Pre-tax margin decline while SONO shows 98.96% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.71%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-15.00%
Net income decline while SONO shows 95.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.05%
Net margin decline while SONO shows 96.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.45%
EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-15.15%
Diluted EPS decline while SONO shows 94.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
0.59%
Share count reduction below 50% of SONO's 0.42%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
-0.08%
Diluted share reduction while SONO shows 0.42% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
